Occupy Wall Street: Will The Strategy Work?

At our company, Cooke Pictures, our first job is to help our clients
get noticed in a crowded, cluttered marketplace of ideas. Then, it’s to
get that target audience to embrace or act on those ideas. From that
perspective, here’s a few strategy related thoughts about Occupy Wall
Street:

1. Having no clear leader undercuts their message. Grass-roots
movements can be powerful, but in a media-driven culture someone needs
to speak for the tribe. Preferably someone articulate and admirable, who
can express the goals and mission of the movement. (Think Nelson
Mandela.) That leader also needs to take responsibility and absorb the
hits if things go wrong. People want to know where the buck stops.

2. Protest is not enough. A few years ago the Tea
Party marched on Washington, D.C., with a clear list of demands: Stop
raising taxes, reduce the size of government, cut spending. Across the
movement people voiced the same vision. But OWS? Everyone you ask has a
different demand, and as a result, the crazies get as much press
coverage as those with serious concerns. Protest is a good start, but
that alone simply annoys the general public.

3. Solutions matter. If all you do
is complain, you’ll get tagged as “the people who are against
everything.” Many Christians are guilty of that in their over-eager
boycotts of Hollywood, the gay community or companies who say “Happy
Holidays” instead of “Merry Christmas.” Complain long enough without
providing an alternative solution and people begin to tune you out.

4. Be Careful What You Leave Behind.
After the Tea Party marched on Washington, network news organizations
showed arial photographs after the march. The main mall was as clean as a
dining room table. But when OWS at Zuccotti Park was finally cleared
recently, there was human excrement left in piles, garbage everywhere
and hypodermic needles that had to be cleaned up. Plus, the scattered
robberies, assaults and rapes that happened in some of the camps didn’t
help the public’s perception.

5. The worst calamity is when the other side co-opts your cause. While
OWS has a legitimate critique of the growing income gap in America, its
lack of an articulate solution gives free-enterprise advocates the
chance to make a more persuasive argument on behalf of their cause.

For instance, they’ve shown real statistics that while the top 1
percent earns about 20 percent of the income today, they also pay 37
percent of federal income tax. Now, The Wall Street Journal
reports that wealth inequality is roughly unchanged from as long as 20,
40, even 80 years ago. Those facts are adding up in the mind of the
public. Your inability to state a convincing argument leaves the other
side open to make it their own.

Keep in mind that it’s not just a matter of whether the initial
public agrees or disagrees with a protest movement. Many Americans
initially fought against the Civil Rights Movement in the ’60s, but
Martin Luther King Jr.’s clear vision and articulate strategy of
nonviolence made the public realize the rightness and inevitability of
the cause.

Last week, USA Today reported its Gallup poll that revealed
six out of 10 Americans have become indifferent to Occupy Wall Street.
It also pointed out that the number of Americans who outright disagree
with the movement is rising as well. Occupy Wall Street is losing
ground, and losing it quickly.

Whatever your cause, a movement will fail if it can’t clearly
articulate it’s ideals. Particularly in today’s media-driven culture,
strategy matters.

Phil Cooke, Ph.D. is a filmmaker, media consultant and author of Jolt! Get the Jump on a World That’s Constantly Changing. You can visit his website at philcooke.com.