last few weeks have provided a fascinating insight into U.S.-Israel relations
and how the leaders of both countries see the Iran nuclear threat. Monday’s Oval Office meeting was important,
but it needs to be put in context with recent statements by CIA Director Leon
Panetta and Admiral Mike Mullen, Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff. Let me
explain.
- If
this was the first meeting between President Barack Obama and Prime Minister Netanyahu,
it would have been great. The President was warm and friendly. He reaffirmed the
“special relationship” and “unbreakable bond” between the U.S. and Israel. He
said he trusted the Prime Minister and appreciated the steps Mr. Netanyahu is
taking towards peace and security. Netanyahu publicly invited Obama to come to
Israel and meet there, and Obama smiled and said, “I’m ready.” - The
problem is that this wasn’t their first meeting. It was their fifth, just the
first to go well. - President
Obama wasted the past 14 months. He has treated Netanyahu like he was the head
of BP oil rather than the leader of our most faithful friend and ally in the
epicenter. Thus, President Obama came into the Oval Office meeting yesterday on
defense. Jewish support for him in the U.S. has plummeted over the past year as
the White House and State Department have treated Israel with unprecedented
hostility. Fewer than 1-in-10 Israelis believe President Obama is pro-Israel
because of the administration’s long string of deeply unfriendly statements and
actions. - By sharp contrast, Congress has been impressively bipartisan in its strong support
of Israel and in its criticism of the White House for being so antagonistic
towards Israel generally and Netanyahu in particular. - The
good news: President Obama and his team seem to have gotten the message and
changed their tune. In public, at least, the administration is trying to repair
the damage they have done and reaffirm the importance of strong and healthy
U.S.-Israel relations. - One
example of a step in the right direction: the President just signed tough new
economic sanctions on Iran, which received huge bipartisan votes in Congress.
This is good. - The
challenge: these sanctions are too little, too late. - Moreover,
behind the smiles of the two leaders, nothing decisive was said about how to
stop Iran from getting the bomb. And time is running out. - CIA
Director Leon Panetta said on June 27 that it would take Iran a year to
convert the uranium they currently have to weapons grade, and another year to
produce a deliverable bomb. - In remarks at the Aspen Institute last week, Admiral
Michael Mullen, Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, agreed with Panetta and
said this was consistent with his own assessment that Iran could have the Bomb
within one to three years. “The Israelis believe this is an existential threat,
in its truest definition, and that has been very much on my mind, obviously,
throughout this whole issue of Iran and its development of nuclear weapons,”
said Mullen. “I believe strategically they [Iran’s government] continue to
pursue it [nuclear weapons]. They’ve not complied with the NPT. They’ve not
complied with the IAEA…They’ve been given every chance to do this and they have
not, and I believe they will not comply with international norms here….I think
it’s incredibly dangerous for them to achieve this capability, destabilizing in
the region….It generates great potential for a nuclear arms race in the Middle
East. The place is unstable enough. We don’t need that. At the same time, I
believe a strike against Iran also will be, should something like that occur,
incredibly destabilizing.” - During
his Q&A session, Admiral Mullen indicated that the U.S. believes Iran has
not yet made a final decision to build nuclear weapons, while the Israelis
believe Iran has made that decision. - CIA
Director Panetta says he believes the new round of economic sanctions imposed on
Iran will cause pain, but will not force Iran to stop its development of nuclear
weapons. “I would agree with that,” said Mullen. This is important news that is
getting overlooked by the mainstream media. - So
the question remains: if sanctions aren’t going to stop Iran from getting the
Bomb, and Iran is dangerously close to building the Bomb, what is President
Obama prepared to do next? Will he take military action. I don’t believe he
will. Will the President support the Israelis taking military action? That
remains to be seen.
Joel C. Rosenberg is the New York Times—best-selling author of seven
novels and nonfiction books about Israel, including Epicenter and
Inside the Revolution. He served as an aide to Benjamin Netanyahu in
2000. This article was originally published at his blog.
Cheri Fuller and Cindy Lamb Curry 
Marilyn Hickey 
Charisma Staff 
